Board members present: Kari Bradley, Adrienne Magida, and Conrad Smith
Administrators present: Bill Kimball, WCSU superintendent, Stephanie Taylor, assistant principal, and Kevin Downey, assistant principal
· Kari Bradley accepted the role of committee chair.
· We reviewed the draft charge for the committee and gained some additional clarity about our work. We identified a key challenge for the committee and the board: maintaining a focus on outcomes and metrics appropriate to the board level. We discussed the fact that the data available for measuring outcomes is imperfect and there is a need to “triangulate” or use multiple correlated measures to better gauge progress.
· We discussed the school’s core values and the process used to generate them. Bill Kimball noted that the core values align well with the outcomes that are typically identified by school communities throughout the country which include aptitude in communication/literacy, problem solving/creative thinking, personal and social responsibility, and lifelong learning. We agreed that we would use the core values as our starting point for desired outcomes.
· We recognized the need to focus in on a limited scope of work. We identified literacy and post-graduation success as our first priorities.
· Action: Kari Bradley will update the draft charge and circulate to the committee.
· Our regular meeting time is the 4th Monday of the month at 4:30pm. However our next meeting will be Tuesday 5/28 5:00 pm.
Next meeting agenda:
1. Review of examples of board-level outcome/measurement definitions from Bill Kimball
2. Discussion of the existing rubrics developed for our core values pertaining to literacy
3. Brainstorm and discussion of possible desired outcomes and metrics pertaining to post-graduation success
Submitted by Kari Bradley
In attendance: Jonathan Goddard, Conrad Smith, Katie Winkeljohn, Tim Flynn
Also present: Bill Kimball, WCSU superintendent; Chuck Davin
Public Comment
Chuck Davin spoke about anonymity
Technology and Privacy Policy
The committee had a wide ranging discussion on technology and privacy. Bill Kimball expressed his feelings that our current way of teaching and using the internet as a resource allow us to individualize our education in ways that we have never been able to do previously. This is a very important resource as we are held accountable for all of our students meeting the standards. We talked about the huge increase in opportunities that Google Docs has allowed in reference to peer collaboration and self reflection. These are tools that are allowing teachers to do some things that they used to not be able to do.
We spoke of managed risk taking as being the underlying foundation of our discussion. How much risk is too much for the benefits we are getting? Is the use of Google docs too much risk? Is the use of Infinite Campus too much risk if we don’t manage it in-house?
One idea that we spoke about was to look at what we do in our classes in regards to teaching about privacy on the internet. Is this something we need to strengthen?
We also discussed the issue under the en loco parentis responsibilities that school have when students are in our care.
Next Meeting: Friday, May 31, 2013 8 am small conference room
School Board members present: Emily Goyette, Kari Bradley
Administration present: Keith Gerritt, principal; Stephanie Taylor, assistant principal; Lori Bibeau, WCSU business manager; Jeff Arey, WCSU technology director
Meeting convened at 8:00 am.
Other Business: Lori Bibeau reported that a SU-wide bid had gone out for new copiers. U-32 needs three: one in the main office, one in the middle school office, and one in the copy center. Jeff advised that their choice is to go with Xerox machines. If purchased outright, the three machines will cost $88K and include the first year’s maintenance contract. The question was raised how to finance the copiers. They are not included in the budgeted capital expenditures for next year, however $33 K lease costs are included in the FY 2014 operating budget. Jeff Arey reported that a four-year lease would run $94K and a lease-to-own option would be $97.6 K. It was decided to go with the standard lease in view of the fact that copying needs and copier technology may change significantly in three years.
Role of the Finance Committee: Lori Bibeau reported that the committee was started in December 1997, around the time that Robbe Brooke became superintendent. She described its role as reviewing bids, administration requests, and the monthly financial report that tracks operational expense vs. projection. She described the NEMRC software system used and the funds that are set up to track revenue and expenses. She noted that the voters in our district have approved keeping a fund balance. In some towns, districts are required to return a fund balance to the taxpayers and conversely raise taxes when needed. She advised that our auditors had recommended that we keep a 5% reserve but that the board had changed that to 4%. She described the effect of using fund balance money last year to reduce the cost to taxpayers, i.e., it will increase the budget next year. Kari Bradley noted that it would behoove us to communicate the fact that taxes will be going up next year early on.
Monthly Financial Report: The report was accepted. Revenues increased by $19K: E-rate $3.5K, net metering $7K, and miscellaneous gate receipts $8.5K. With respect to net metering, we have now collected $3,500, but the projection for FY 2013 is $7K and has been booked. We saw increased expense of $6K for the Alternative Path to Graduation program but savings of $6K in property insurance and $17K in transportation expense (for having to use our old buses last fall) for a net savings of $17,111. Fund balance is currently running at $89,704 above the board’s minimum 4% reserve.
Roof Project Update: Bids will be opened at 10:00 am on April 2nd at U-32. Emily Goyette will attend.
More Other Business: Tim Flynn would like to apply for two grants, one from the Nellie Mae Foundation and one from the Bay & Paul Foundations, to fund a 0.5 FTE position for a coordinator for students going out into the community and requiring mentoring. They would include students in the Branching Out, Branching Out English, Pilot, and CBL high school programs, and middle school Branching Out as well. There are approximately 60 students who would benefit from this service. The Bay & Paul Foundations grant had a March 1st application deadline but Tim Flynn asked for an extension. The Nellie Mae Foundation application is due in April. The cost of the position is estimated to be $20K, with a slight rise in cost each subsequent year. The grants would be for three years. The first year we’d receive $10K from each grant; the second year we’d receive $5K from each grant; the third year we’d receive $2K from each grant. Because of the future financial impact, Keith will need to bring the request before the board. Kari Bradley and Emily Goyette agreed that it was a reasonable request to present.
Emily requested that Keith and Lori provide a report, similar to last year’s, that lists U32’s special programs, their cost, and the number of students served. Emily also asked Keith to request the co-curricular participation numbers for the 2011-2012 school year from Amy Molina.
Next Month: Discuss food service meals pricing. Meeting time will change to 8:15 – 9:15 am through June.
Adjourned at 9:05 a.m.
Submitted by Emily Goyette
School Board Members Present: Emily Goyette, Adrienne Magida
Administrators Present: Stephanie Taylor, Assistant Principal
We looked at the charge of the Curriculum Committee and the definition of curriculum and after lots of discussion decided to propose to the full Board to eliminate the Curriculum Committee because much of what the committee discusses needs to be discussed with the full Board or it is not within the jurisdiction of the School Board.
School Board Members Present: Emily Goyette, Adrienne Magida, Ginny Burley
Administrators Present: Stephanie Taylor, Assistant Principal
We looked at the parts of Act 153 which pertain to duties of a supervisory Union Board in terms of curriculum –
“The board of each supervisory union shall establish a supervisory union-wide curriculum, by either developing the curriculum or assisting the member districts to develop it jointly, and ensure implementation of the curriculum.”
Agenda for January 2 meeting:
Look at U-32’s Curriculum Policy and write a charge for the Curriculum Committee, which should include ensuring the policy is implemented and decide what an assessment plan will look like.
At the Board meeting following the Curriculum Committee meeting the Board discussed part of its self-assessment. Bill Kimball noted that he has school goals related to:
· Critical thinking
· Communication
· Problem-solving
· Social responsibility
from the Commonwealth countries that we should look at as we proceed with our curriculum work.